Thursday, March 19

$200 billion for the war in Iran? Trump calls it a ‘small price to pay.’


Debate in Washington over the cost of the war in Iran escalated on Thursday as a new possible price tag of $200 billion began to circulate among policymakers.

The figure isn’t final but could represent the Trump administration’s eventual request to Congress — a “supplemental funding bill,” in Washington parlance — to cover additional costs stemming from the war.

The Washington Post was first to report the eye-popping figure, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday defended the number, which would be on top of the Pentagon’s $1 trillion annual budget.

“It takes money to kill bad guys,” Hegseth told reporters, with President Trump later seeming to endorse the figure.

“This kind of funding bill is going to ensure that we’re properly funded going forward,” Hegseth added.

The new figure drew immediate pushback, as it appears to suggest that the military is preparing for an extended engagement in the region. Trump officials previously told lawmakers that in the first week of the war, the costs were about $11.3 billion, or nearly $2 billion a day.

The $200 billion figure exceeds all of what the US has spent in support of Ukraine since that war began. A recent Council on Foreign Relations report found that $188 billion has been spent there since 2022.

Read more: How oil price shocks ripple through your wallet, from gas to groceries

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks about military operations in Iran during a press briefing on March 19. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks about military operations in Iran during a press briefing on March 19. (Win McNamee/Getty Images) · Win McNamee via Getty Images

Previous guesses about the Pentagon’s request were closer to $100 billion. The higher figure was met with skepticism among even some of Trump’s allies.

Sen. Roger Marshall, a Kansas Republican, said Thursday morning on Fox Business that $200 billion on top of the Pentagon’s current budget “sounds like a high number to me.”

It also came amid an increasing sense that achieving a quick end to the conflict in Iran will be harder than the Trump administration has promised.

Iran continues to exercise an effective veto in shipping traffic in the crucial Strait of Hormuz and launched new attacks on oil infrastructure this week in a back-and-forth with US and Israeli forces that has kept oil prices above $100 per barrel.

Hegseth pledged little change in the ongoing attacks on Thursday, saying, “We will finish this.”

Read more: How to protect your money as Mideast turmoil fuels market volatility

TEHRAN, IRAN - MARCH 13: Smoke rises after airstrikes in Tehran, Iran on March 13, 2026. Successive explosions were heard across the Iranian capital Tehran on Friday, amid continuing regional tensions following US and Israeli strikes on Iran (Photo by Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Smoke rises after airstrikes in Tehran on March 13. (Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images) · Anadolu via Getty Images

Few expect a request for additional funds from Congress to be easy.

Democrats pledged to block the funding request even before the $200 billion figure began circulating on Thursday.

Even House Speaker Mike Johnson, in brief comments to CNN on Thursday, declined to endorse the figure. Johnson, a close Trump ally, said instead that he’d look at the details when they are offered and would only say, “I support what’s needed to ensure that the American people remain safe.”

Sen. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat, posted what has been the position of most Democrats for weeks: “The answer is a simple no.”

Republicans have previously suggested they might try to address the issue under the reconciliation process, which would require only a majority approval in the Senate. But that is a fraught legislative maneuver that’s far from certain to succeed and would require Republican unanimity.

Another possible mechanism for the additional funding is the annual defense policy bill, which sets funding for the Pentagon’s overall operations. That bill is often described as one of the “must-pass” bills each year, but it also requires Democratic votes.

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 19: Prime Minister of Japan Sanae Takaichi (L) meets with U.S. President Donald Trump (2L) as U.S. Vice President JD Vance (3L), U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio (2R), and U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (R) look on during a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 19, 2026 in Washington, DC. The two leaders are expected to discuss topics including the current conflict in Iran and the threat that is posed by China. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
President Trump speaks alongside Japan Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Thursday during a bilateral meeting at the White House on March 19. (Alex Wong/Getty Images) · Alex Wong via Getty Images

President Trump has previously suggested a $1.5 trillion Pentagon budget and seemed to confirm it when asked on Thursday.

“We are asking for a lot of reasons,” Trump said, adding that funding is also about rebuilding the overall military beyond what is happening in Iran.

The request, he said, is “a small price to pay to make sure that we stay tippy top.”

Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance.

Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow’s stock prices

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *