NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said the league views prediction markets the same as traditional sports betting.
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver has made clear that the league sees little distinction between prediction markets and traditional sports betting in terms of integrity and oversight.
Speaking publicly about the evolving gambling landscape, Silver indicated that contracts tied to game outcomes present risks and regulatory concerns similar to those associated with sportsbook wagers.
The comments come as prediction market platforms expand into sports-related event contracts, drawing heightened scrutiny from leagues and regulators alike. The clarification also comes at a time when NBA-related gambling scandals appear to have peaked over the past year.
Adam Silver on Giannis’ recent partnership with Kalshi:
“We currently are looking at prediction markets in the same way as sports betting companies. In the case of Giannis, it’s a minuscule investment…..We need a better handle on all the activity happening out there.”
— Kelly Iko (@KellyIko) February 14, 2026
NBA’s Position on Prediction Markets
Silver emphasized that from the NBA’s perspective, whether a fan places a wager through a sportsbook or trades a contract on a federally regulated exchange, the underlying exposure is similar.
Key concerns include:
- Game integrity risks
- Insider information misuse
- Player harassment tied to betting losses
The NBA has long supported regulated sports betting markets, advocating for integrity monitoring and data-sharing agreements. Silver suggested prediction markets should be treated under a comparable lens. Other top American sports leagues have recently announced partnerships with prediction markets, which makes Silver’s clarification interesting in light of that.
Why the Issue Is Emerging Now
Prediction market platforms have increasingly offered contracts tied to sporting events, including NBA games.
Unlike traditional sportsbooks, many of these platforms operate under federal derivatives oversight rather than state gaming licenses.
This structure has triggered legal battles between:
- State gaming regulators
- Federally regulated exchanges
- Sports leagues seeking clarity
Silver’s remarks signal that professional leagues may not view prediction markets as fundamentally different from betting, even if regulators classify them differently.
Integrity and Oversight Concerns
The NBA has built formal partnerships with sportsbooks and data companies to monitor betting patterns and detect irregular activity.
Silver suggested similar safeguards should apply to prediction markets offering sports contracts.
From the league’s standpoint, the core issue is not the technical structure of the wager, but whether financial incentives tied to game outcomes create vulnerabilities.
The NBA has previously advocated for transparency, information sharing, and robust surveillance tools in legalized sports betting frameworks.
Broader Regulatory Context
The debate unfolds amid ongoing federal and state disputes over who regulates sports-based event contracts.
Some prediction market operators argue their products are federally regulated financial instruments.
State regulators and sportsbooks argue that when tied to sports, they functionally resemble betting and should be licensed accordingly.
Silver’s position aligns the NBA with the view that sports-related financial contracts, regardless of structure, carry comparable risks.
What This Means for the Industry
Silver’s comments could influence how leagues approach partnerships and compliance with prediction platforms.
If leagues treat prediction markets like sportsbooks, operators may face:
- Pressure to adopt league-approved integrity standards
- Calls for data-sharing agreements
- Increased scrutiny over player and referee exposure
Professional leagues hold significant sway in shaping public and regulatory opinion around gambling policy.
Bottom Line
Adam Silver has stated that the NBA views prediction markets tied to sports outcomes the same as traditional sports betting.
As legal battles over sports-based event contracts continue, the league’s position reinforces the argument that integrity standards should apply uniformly, regardless of how a wager is structured.
Players trust our reporting due to our commitment to unbiased and professional evaluations of the iGaming sector. We track hundreds of platforms and industry updates daily to ensure our news feed and leaderboards reflect the most recent market shifts. With nearly two decades of experience within iGaming, our team provides a wealth of expert knowledge. This long-standing expertise enables us to deliver thorough, reliable news and guidance to our readers.