Wednesday, 18 February 2026
Author: Meg Cochrane
On 11 August 2025, the Court of Arbitration for Sport, (CAS), dismissed the appeal of Crystal Palace FC, (Palace). Palace had pursued an appeal against UEFA, Nottingham Forest FC, (Forest), and Olympique Lyonnais, (Lyon). It centred on UEFA’s decision to demote Palace from the 2025/26 UEFA Europa League to the Conference League, while admitting Lyon to the Europa League despite the two clubs having linked ownership structures.
CAS, in upholding the decision rendered by the First Chamber of the UEFA Club Financial Control Body, found that Palace had breached the multi-club ownership rules contained in the 2025/26 UEFA Club Competitions Regulations, (the Regulations).[1]
This article explores the reasons for CAS’ decision and the regulatory framework in which it was decided, before identifying two key questions for European professional football that arise from the decision.
- First, does CAS’ decision, and UEFA’s rules more generally about the allocation of places in its European competitions, prejudice more competitive national leagues?
- Second, how does European professional football protect its integrity in the face of ever-increasing commercialisation?
Contents
To continue reading or watching login or register here
Already a member? Sign in
Get access to all of the expert analysis and commentary at LawInSport including articles, webinars, conference videos and podcast transcripts. Find out more here.
Related Articles
Written by
Meg Cochrane
Meg is a barrister at 1EC. She has a multi-disciplinary practice and welcomes instructions across a range of Chambers’ areas of expertise. In sports, recent matters on which Meg has been instructed include drafting an application on behalf of the purchasers of the EFL League One football club, Reading FC, (led by Jonathan Miller); and advising on whether a decision rendered by the International Cricket Council’s Anti-Corruption Tribunal could be judicially reviewed (assisting Lisa Hatch).