Go to https://ground.news/drg for a better way to stay informed. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access to world-wide coverage through my link.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOmjR-JVOshlZbUoQYOCxWg/join
Dr. G’s Body Language Course:
https://www.drgexplains.com/offers/CEnNLKFa
In this video, Dr. G, clinical and forensic psychologist and body language expert, takes a deep dive into the growing evidence of a potential cover-up surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Using the newly released Epstein files, Dr. G analyzes interviews with the correctional officers on duty, breaking down behavioral inconsistencies and contradictions when their statements are compared directly with the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) report. This analysis focuses on what was said, what was avoided, and how those discrepancies matter in a case that was supposedly “settled.”
The latest Epstein files release includes interviews, internal records, and investigative material connected to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, the Department of Justice, DOJ OIG, William Barr, Michael Horowitz, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, MCC New York, and multiple unnamed correctional officers and supervisors. These materials revisit key issues such as the malfunctioning cameras, falsified or incomplete logs, staffing failures, and the now-infamous “orange figure” seen on surveillance footage near Epstein’s cell. Despite years of speculation, the OIG itself has confirmed that this figure is not the explanation for what happened that night, raising fresh questions about timelines, accountability, and whether critical facts were minimized or misrepresented in earlier public narratives surrounding Epstein’s death.
The Epstein files remain an active and evolving story as newly released documents, interviews, emails, flight logs, and investigative records tied to Jeffrey Epstein continue to raise questions about the scope of his network and how his case was handled by federal authorities. The materials reference a wide range of powerful figures across politics, finance, and global business, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, Leslie Wexner, Alan Dershowitz, Jean-Luc Brunel, and others, while it remains critical to note that appearing in the files does not itself establish wrongdoing. At the same time, pressure is mounting on the Department of Justice, the FBI, the Bureau of Prisons, and the DOJ Office of the Inspector General over redactions, investigative gaps, and prior conclusions surrounding Epstein’s death at MCC New York. Looking ahead, upcoming depositions, congressional inquiries, and potential witness testimony are expected to further scrutinize Epstein’s finances, communications, international travel, and relationships, keeping the Epstein files in the spotlight as journalists, lawmakers, and independent analysts continue to uncover new details and unresolved inconsistencies.
Dr. G walks through why these inconsistencies matter, how institutional reporting often protects systems rather than truth, and what behavioral analysis can reveal when official explanations don’t align. This video connects the dots between the Epstein files, the OIG findings, and the human behavior behind the paperwork—showing why the “case closed” narrative doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. If you want a grounded, forensic look at what the evidence actually says—and what it doesn’t—this is one you don’t want to miss.
#epsteinfiles #epstein #trump
————————
Visit my website: www.drgexplains.com
————————
Dr. G is a clinical and forensic psychologist. He is a published author, entrepreneur, and currently conducts psychotherapy, and couples’ therapy.
Disclaimer
THIS IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT The information offered herein does not constitute a substitute for professional psychological treatment, therapy, or other types of professional advice and intervention. Dr. Garrison does not assume any responsibility for errors, omissions or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein. The informational contents are solely the opinion of Dr. Garrison and should not be considered as a form of therapy, advice, direction and/or diagnosis or treatment of any kind: medical, spiritual, mental, or other. Instead, the information is provided as entertainment. If expert advice or counseling is needed, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
source