Thelwall, M. & Kousha, K. ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 68, 468–479 (2017).
Gardner, K. & Leary, H. Online learning for first-generation and underrepresented minoritized students: a literature review using a model of student engagement. Online Learn. 27, 263–291 (2023).
Spring, K. J., Graham, C. R., Hanny, C. N., Tuiloma, S. & Badar, K. Academic communities of engagement: exploring the impact of online and in-person support communities on the academic engagement of online learners. J. Comput. High. Educ. 36, 702–726 (2024).
Schmied, J. Popular digital knowledge dissemination platforms: evaluating the pragmatic professional credibility from Wikipedia to Academia. edu and ResearchGate. J. Pragmat. 180, 187–202 (2021).
Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., Ni, C. Q., Gingras, Y. & Cronin, B. Global gender disparities in science. Nature 504, 211–213 (2013).
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. & Williams, W. M. Women in academic science: a changing landscape. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 15, 75–141 (2014).
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K. & Jiang, L. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychol. Bull. 143, 1–35 (2017).
Huang, J., Gates, A. J., Sinatra, R. & Barabási, A. L. Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 4609–4616 (2020).
Klein, S. L. et al. Sex inclusion in basic research drives discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5257–5258 (2015).
UNESCO, Data from “Women in Science” (UIS Fact Sheet No. 60 | June 2020).
Bakshi-Hamm, P. & Hamm, A. Knowledge production: Analyzing gender- and country-dependent factors in research topics through term communities. Publications 10, 45 (2022).
Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E. & Lo, L. Do gender-science stereotypes predict science identification and science career aspirations among undergraduate science majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16, 541–554 (2013).
Penner, A. M. Gender inequality in science. Science 347, 234–235 (2015).
Rhoton, L. A. Distancing as a gendered barrier: understanding women scientists’ gender practices. Gend. Soc. 25, 696–716 (2011).
Stout, J. G., Grunberg, V. A. & Ito, T. A. Gender roles and stereotypes about science careers help explain women and men’s science pursuits. Sex. Roles 75, 490–499 (2016).
Macaluso, B., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, T. & Sugimoto, C. Is science built on the shoulders of women? A study of gender differences in contributorship. Acad. Med. 91, 1136–1142 (2016).
Leslie, S., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M. & Freeland, E. Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347, 262–265 (2015).
Larregue, J. & Nielsen, M. W. Knowledge hierarchies and gender disparities in social science funding. Sociology 58, 45–65 (2024).
Hofstra, B. et al. The diversity-innovation paradox in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9284–9291 (2020).
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. Doing gender. Gend. Soc. 1, 125–151 (1987).
Hutt, R. These 10 Countries are Closest to Achieving Gender Equality (World Economic Forum, 2019).
Lapatinas, A., Litina, A. & Zanaj, S. The relationship between knowledge accumulation and gender norms. Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2024).
Clance, P. R. & Imes, S. A. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract. 15, 241 (1978).
Bonetta, L. Reaching gender equity in science: the importance of role models and mentors. Science 327, 889–895 (2010).
Lockwood, P. Someone like me can be successful”: do college students need same-gender role models? Psychol. Women Q. 30, 36–46 (2006).
Yang, J. & Zhang, M. Beyond structural inequality: a socio-technical approach to the digital divide in the platform environment. Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 1–12 (2023).
Loeb, S. How effective is online learning? What the research does and doesn’t tell us. Educ. Week 39, 17 (2020).
Vásárhelyi, O. et al. Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars’ work. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102945118 (2021).
Whittington, K. B. A tie is a tie? Gender and network positioning in life science inventor collaboration. Res. Policy 47, 511–526 (2018).
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A. & Murgia, G. Gender differences in research collaboration. J. Informetr. 7, 811–822 (2013).
Holman, L. & Morandin, C. Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PLoS ONE 14, e0216128 (2019).
Papaioannou, T. Technological innovation, global justice and politics of development. Prog. Dev. Stud. 11, 321–338 (2011).
Kozlowski, D. et al. Intersectional inequalities in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2113067119 (2022).
Livingstone, D. N. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, 2010).
Kozlowski, J., Radosevic, S. & Ircha, D. History matters: the inherited disciplinary structure of the post-communist science in countries of central and eastern Europe and its restructuring. Scientometrics 45, 137–166 (1999).
Boschma, R., Heimeriks, G. & Balland, P. A. Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities. Res. Policy 43, 107–114 (2014).
Hidalgo, C. A. et al. The principle of relatedness. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Complex Systems 9 (Springer, 2018), 451–457.
Chinazzi, M., Goncalves, B., Zhang, Q. & Vespignani, A. Mapping the physics research space: a machine learning approach. EPJ Data Sci. 8, 33 (2019).
Lee, L. C., Lin, P. H., Chuang, Y. W. & Lee, Y. Y. Research output and economic output: a Granger causality test. Scientometrics 89, 465–478 (2011).
Kumar, R. R., Stauvermann, P. J. & Patel, A. Exploring the link between research and economic growth: an empirical study of China and USA. Qual. Quant. 50, 1073–1091 (2016).
Clayton, J. A. & Collins, F. S. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature 509, 282–283 (2014).
Koning, R., Samila, S. & Ferguson, J. Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women’s health, but few women get to invent. Science 372, 1345–1348 (2021).
Sugimoto, C. R., Ahn, Y., Smith, E., Macaluso, B. & Larivière, V. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis. Lancet 393, 550–559 (2019).
Lordan, G. & Pischke, J. S. Does Rosie like riveting? Male and female occupational choices. Economica 89, 110–130 (2022).
Lippa, R. A., Preston, K. & Penner, J. Women’s representation in 60 occupations from 1972 to 2010: more women in high-status jobs, few women in things-oriented jobs. PloS one 9, e95960 (2014).
Su, R. R. James, All stem fields are not created equal: people and things interests explain gender disparities across stem fields. Front. Psychol. 6, 189 (2015).
Song, B., Jiang, Z. & Li, X. Modeling knowledge need awareness using the problematic situations elicited from questions and answers. Knowl. Based Syst. 75, 173–183 (2015).
Pee, L. G. Community’s knowledge need and knowledge sharing in Wikipedia. J. Knowl. Manag. 22, 912–930 (2018).
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S. & Williams, W. M. Examining gender inequality in science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 13602–13608 (2014).
Marginson, S. What drives global science? The four competing narratives. Stud. Higher Educ. 47, 1566–1584 (2022).
Gui, Q. C., Liu, C. L., Du, D. B. & Duan, D. Z. The changing geography of global science. Environ. Plan. A 51, 1615–1617 (2019).
Miao, L. L. et al. The latent structure of global scientific development. Nat. Hum. Behav. 6, 1206 (2022).
Lin, S. Gender study on the status and role of women in scientific experiments. J. Chin. Women’s. Stud. 0, 48–53 (2011).
Fox, J. & Moreland, J. J. The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 168–176 (2015).
Shaw, F. Still ‘Searching for Safety Online’: Collective strategies and discursive resistance to trolling and harassment in a feminist network. Fibrecult. J. 22, 93–108 (2013).
Pan, X., Hou, Y. & Wang, Q. Are we braver in cyberspace? Social media anonymity enhances moral courage. Comput. Hum. Behav. 148, 107880 (2023).
Thelwall, M., Bailey, C., Tobin, C. & Bradshaw, N. A. Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: can people and thing orientations explain the results? J. Informetr. 13, 149–169 (2019).
Heiberger, R. H. Applying machine learning in sociology: how to predict gender and reveal research preferences. Kölner Z. für. Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS) 74, 383–406 (2022).
Kleijn, M. D. The researcher journey through a gender lens: an examination of research participation, career progression and perceptions across the globe. Elsevier (2020).
Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-first Century (Harvard University Press, 2014).
Rubin, H. & O’Connor, C. Discrimination and collaboration in science. Philos. Sci. 85, 380–402 (2017).
Blair-Loy, M., Mayorova, O. V., Cosman, P. C. & Fraley, S. I. Can rubrics combat gender bias in faculty hiring? Science 377, 35 (2022).
Way, S. F., Larremore, D. B. & Clauset, A. Gender, productivity, and prestige in computer science faculty hiring networks. In Proc. 2016 World Wide Web Conference (WWW) Vol. 11, 1169–1179 (2016).
Alexander, Q. & Hermann, M. A. African-american women’s experiences in graduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education at a predominantly white university: a qualitative investigation. J. Divers. High. Educ. 9, 307–322 (2016).
Wang, D. & Barabási, A. The Science of Science (Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Andersson, E. R., Hagberg, C. E. & Haegg, S. Gender bias impacts top-merited candidates. Front. Res. Metrics Anal. 6, 594424 (2021).
Jacob, B. A. & Lefgren, L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J. Public Econ. 95, 1168–1177 (2011).
ResearchGate, Data from. https://www.researchgate.net/aboutus.About.html. Deposited 2024-06-02.
Yan, W., Wen, X., Zhang, Y., Kudva, S. & Liu, Q. The dynamics of q&a in academic social networking sites: insights from participants, interaction network, response time, and discipline differences. Scientometrics 128, 1895–1922 (2023).
Sebo, P. Performance of gender detection tools: a comparative study of name-to-gender inference services. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 109, 414 (2021).