Get insights on thousands of stocks from the global community of over 7 million individual investors at Simply Wall St.
The latest update edges Energy Transfer’s Fair Value Estimate to US$21.93 from US$21.68, placing it closer to the cluster of analyst price targets in the low US$20s. That shift lines up with research that is generally constructive, as some firms raise targets on stronger views of the natural gas portfolio while others stay cautious around re contracting and execution risk. Read on to see how to track these evolving calls and use the changing narrative as a reference point for your own research process.
Stay updated as the Fair Value for Energy Transfer shifts by adding it to your watchlist or portfolio. Alternatively, explore our Community to discover new perspectives on Energy Transfer.
-
Morgan Stanley lifted its price target to US$21 from US$19 while keeping an Equal Weight rating, reflecting a view that Energy Transfer fits within its North American midstream and renewable infrastructure coverage at a valuation that aligns with peers.
-
Jefferies raised its target to US$20 from US$17 and highlighted company updates on natural gas projects as “rather exceptional,” which points to confidence in the project pipeline and potential cash flow contribution from the gas portfolio.
-
Barclays, even after trimming its target to US$22 from US$25, reaffirmed an Overweight rating and cited Energy Transfer’s “commercial discipline and ingenuity” as support for a constructive outlook on the partnership’s ability to manage its asset base.
-
Raymond James adding Energy Transfer to its Analyst Current Favorites list signals that the firm sees the risk or reward profile as comparatively attractive versus its broader coverage universe.
-
Jefferies, despite the higher target, kept a Hold rating and argued that Energy Transfer’s gas exposure still does not have the scale to fully address what it views as a valuation discount, hinting at questions around longer term growth drivers.
-
Barclays mentioned concerns around upcoming re contracting events across key assets, which keeps execution and contract renewal risk on the radar even within an overall supportive stance.
Do your thoughts align with the Bull or Bear Analysts? Perhaps you think there’s more to the story. Head to the Simply Wall St Community to discover more perspectives!
We’ve flagged 2 risks for Energy Transfer. See which could impact your investment.
-
Energy Transfer reported no unit repurchases under its buyback program between October 1, 2025 and December 31, 2025, keeping total repurchases since the 2015 authorization at 39,768,205 units for US$1,120.41m.
-
The partnership declared a quarterly cash distribution of US$0.3350 per common unit for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, or US$1.34 on an annualized basis, which it described as more than 3% above the prior year period.
-
Energy Transfer outlined a larger scope for its Transwestern Pipeline Desert Southwest expansion, planning to increase the mainline diameter to 48 inches with potential capacity of up to 2.3b cubic feet per day. Project costs are now expected at up to about US$5,600m excluding AFUDC.
-
The Desert Southwest expansion is intended to serve Arizona and New Mexico from the Permian Basin, with timing currently described as in service by the fourth quarter of 2029. Ultimate capacity is expected to be set by market demand, including possible coal plant retirements or conversions to natural gas.