Thirty-four states now require legislative review of at least some agency regulations, according to a Ballotpedia study.
03/20/2026 12:20 P.M.
As state legislative sessions across the country draw to a close, Ballotpedia re-released a 2025 study highlighting a significant trend for the financial services industry: how state legislatures oversee executive agency rulemaking.
“State legislatures oversee executive agency rulemaking through a variety of mechanisms,” Ballotpedia reports. “Legislatures may be tasked with reviewing regulations or explicitly approving them before adoption. They can also disapprove of or nullify regulations and hold hearings about proposed or adopted rules. In some instances, a legislature’s roles depend on the nature of the regulation or rule.”
For financial firms, this means that state-level regulations — from debt collection rules and licensing to data privacy — may be increasingly subject to political and procedural hurdles before they can take effect.
The National Landscape: A Shift Toward Required Review
The study reveals that legislatures are no longer just delegating authority to agencies; they are actively monitoring how that authority is used.
- Mandatory Oversight: 34 states now require legislative review of at least some agency regulations. Of these, 27 states have strict mandatory oversight mechanisms in place.
- The Power to Block: In many jurisdictions, oversight isn’t just a check-in. Forty-one states authorize legislative committees to review regulations, with powers that include delaying, disapproving, or even recommending the total nullification of proposed rules.
- Broad Scope: 32 states require a review of all rules, meaning even minor technical updates in financial regulations could be subject to legislative sign-off.
Why This Matters for Financial Services
For compliance officers and industry executives, this shift introduces both new risks and new opportunities for advocacy:
- Increased Lead Times: With more states requiring full legislative bodies or committees to approve rules, the window between a rule being finalized by an agency and actually becoming enforceable is widening.
- Fiscal Accountability: A growing number of states (six, currently) are adopting “REINS-style” policies. These require explicit legislative approval for any rule that exceeds a certain economic impact threshold. For the financial sector, where compliance costs can be high, this provides a critical safeguard against regulatory overreach.
- New Avenues for Advocacy: Because 41 states use legislative committees for oversight, trade associations have a specific venue to voice concerns about the practical impacts of a rule after the agency’s public comment period has closed.
Key Statistics at a Glance
- 31 states authorize the full legislative body to review regulations.
- 13 states use specialized legislative agencies or divisions to audit rules for compliance and fiscal impact.
- 6 states currently lack clear provisions for legislative review, though this number is shrinking as more states introduce administrative state reforms.
Looking Ahead
The 2025 data suggests that the era of automatic rulemaking is ending in many states. As your agency prepares for the second half of the year and regulations in 2026, it is helpful to monitor not just the agencies (like state Departments of Financial Institutions), but also the legislative oversight committees that hold the reins for new regulations.
For more state legislative updates, ACA International members are invited to register for the weekly ACA Huddle at 11 a.m. CDT on Wednesdays.
Remember, subscribe to ACA Daily and Member Alerts under your My ACA Assistant profile when logged in to ACA’s website.