Saturday, March 28

BLM abandoned best-available science for Wyoming, Montana sage grouse, lawsuit argues


A new lawsuit argues that the Bureau of Land Management’s recently revised sage grouse plans for Wyoming and Montana are inadequate to reverse population declines that have continued to plague the beleaguered bird.

Filed by Earthjustice on Thursday in the U.S. District Court of Montana, the 68-page complaint contends that the Trump administration in 2025 did away with conservation safeguards implemented under the Obama administration. Those safeguards prevented federal wildlife officials from listing sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act 11 years ago.

“The Trump administration is basically gutting those plans, and reneging on the commitments it made in 2015 to protect the safe grouse,” Earthjustice senior attorney Mike Freeman told WyoFile on Friday. “They really just ignore the science and haven’t faced up to the question of whether these plans put sage grouse on a trajectory towards extinction.” 

Earthjustice is representing the Montana Wildlife Federation, The Wilderness Society and Defenders of Wildlife. U.S. Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum — who oversees the BLM — is listed as the primary defendant. 

The complaint argues watered-down plans have enabled continued sage grouse declines in Wyoming and Montana, which encompass “over half” the remaining sage grouse in the world and are a “critical bulwark” for the population.

“[W]hile BLM’s management prescriptions have changed, the plight of the sage-grouse has not,” Earthjustice’s lawsuit states. “The species remains in decline, with populations diminishing by 13% across eastern Wyoming and Montana, and 24% in western Wyoming, since 2013.” 

Earthjustice’s complaint is the second lawsuit of this sort. 

On March 2, Advocates for the West sued the BLM on behalf of seven conservation groups who disagree with the agency’s entire nine-state policy, which covers 65 million acres of sage grouse habitat in Montana, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. 

Some claims in the two lawsuits echo each other. Both, for example, take issue with the BLM no longer prioritizing oil and gas infrastructure outside of sage grouse habitat. The two lawsuits also cite the federal agency abandoning a “targeted annual warning system” that was intended to flag sage grouse subpopulations where the birds are in trouble. 

Because both lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court of Montana, they may be consolidated. 

“We’ll see what the court wants to do,” Freeman said. “It’s very possible.” 

Gov. Mark Gordon during his 2026 State of the State address at the Wyoming Capitol in Cheyenne. (Mike Vanata/WyoFile)

Gov. Mark Gordon’s office told WyoFile in a statement on Friday that the state is weighing whether to intervene in the case. The governor lauded Wyoming’s sage grouse policy, and said the state is “continuing to adapt the [policy] with best-available science.” 

“Wyoming has been and continues to be a pioneer in sage-grouse protection and management, supported by over 60 years of experience,” Gordon said.

In the BLM’s late 2025 revision, the agency deferred to the states, including Wyoming. 

Wyoming houses roughly 40% of the sage grouse left in the world, largely as a result of having the most intact remaining sagebrush ecosystem

Still, despite temporary cyclic population upswings, grouse numbers have stayed in a long-term decline, Wyoming Game and Fish Department data shows. Between 2016 and 2025, the number of occupied sage grouse leks — where the birds strut and breed — fell 6.5%, from roughly 1,840 to 1,720. 

(Wyoming Game and Fish Department)

The recent population declines detailed in Earthjustice’s complaint (13% in eastern Wyoming and 24% in western Wyoming) come from a 2024 U.S. Geological Survey study, according to Freeman. 

Earthjustice is asking the federal court to strike down the BLM’s 2025 sage grouse plans for Wyoming and Montana, reverting to the Obama administration-era 2015 plans. 

Attorneys argue violations of the National Environmental Policy Act, Administrative Procedure Act and Federal Land Policy and Management Act. 

The latter statute is the “core law” that governs how the BLM is supposed to manage public lands, Freeman said. 

“Part of BLM’s central mandate is that it needs to maintain sustainable populations of native species,” he said. “It can’t just run our public lands to maximize oil and gas development and let species like the sage grouse go extinct.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *