Wednesday, March 11

Multicolor interband solitons in microcombs


Theory of multicolor interband solitons generation

Here, the coupled rings are effectively replaced with a single cavity, and the three supermode families in Fig. 1g are viewed as independent transverse mode families. The assumption is validated in the Supplementary Information. The soliton dynamics in presence of parametric interaction is governed by14,24,

$$\begin{array}{rcl}\frac{\partial }{\partial T}{E}_{{\text{p}}} & = & -\left(\frac{{\kappa }_{{\text{p}}}}{2}+i\delta {\omega }_{{\text{p}}}\right){E}_{{\text{p}}}+i\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{p}}}}{2}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {\phi }^{2}}{E}_{{\text{p}}}+2i{g}_{{\text{FWM}}}^{* }{E}_{{\rm{s}}}{E}_{{\text{i}}}{E}_{{\text{p}}}^{* }\\ & & +i({g}_{0}| {E}_{{\text{p}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{s}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{i}}}{| }^{2}){E}_{{\text{p}}}+F\end{array}$$

(3)

$$\begin{array}{rcl}\frac{\partial }{\partial T}{E}_{{\text{s}}} & = & -\left(\frac{{\kappa }_{{\text{s}}}}{2}+i\delta {\omega }_{{\text{s}}}\right){E}_{{\text{s}}}-\Delta {D}_{1,{\text{s}}}\frac{\partial }{\partial \phi }{E}_{{\text{s}}}+i\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{s}}}}{2}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {\phi }^{2}}{E}_{{\text{s}}}\\ & & +i({g}_{0}| {E}_{{\rm{\text{s}}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{p}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{i}}}{| }^{2}){E}_{{\text{s}}}\\ & & +i{g}_{\text{FWM}}{E}_{{\text{p}}}^{2}{E}_{{\text{i}}}^{* }\end{array}$$

(4)

$$\begin{array}{rcl}\frac{\partial }{\partial T}{E}_{{\text{i}}} & = & -\left(\frac{{\kappa }_{{\text{i}}}}{2}+i\delta {\omega }_{{\text{i}}}\right){E}_{{\text{i}}}-\Delta {D}_{1,{\text{i}}}\frac{\partial }{\partial \phi }{E}_{{\text{i}}}+i\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{i}}}}{2}\frac{{\partial }^{2}}{\partial {\phi }^{2}}{E}_{{\text{i}}}\\ & & +i({g}_{0}| {E}_{{\text{i}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{p}}}{| }^{2}+2{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}| {E}_{{\text{s}}}{| }^{2}){E}_{\text{i}}\\ & & +i{g}_{{\text{FWM}}}{E}_{{\text{p}}}^{2}{E}_{{\text{s}}}^{* }\end{array}$$

(5)

Here, the slow-varying electric fields Ek (k = p, s, i for primary soliton, secondary soliton and idler sideband respectively, * denotes complex conjugate) are defined in the co-rotating frame of the primary soliton and normalized to photon number. The carrier angular frequencies are denoted by ωk (k = p, s, i), respectively. ωp equals the pump angular frequency. The choice of ωs and ωi is not deterministic, but to eliminate the phase factor in the four-wave-mixing (FWM) terms, it is forced that

$${\omega }_{{\text{s}}}+{\omega }_{{\text{i}}}=2{\omega }_{{\text{p}}}$$

(6)

We further define detuning δωk = ωk,cωk (ωk,c is the corresponding cavity mode angular frequency, k = p, s, i), where

$$\delta {\omega }_{{\text{s}}}+\delta {\omega }_{{\text{i}}}-2\delta {\omega }_{{\text{p}}}\equiv {\omega }_{{\text{s}},{\text{c}}}+{\omega }_{{\text{i}},{\text{c}}}-2{\omega }_{{\text{p}},{\text{c}}}\equiv {\rm{C}}{\rm{o}}{\rm{n}}{\rm{s}}{\rm{t}}{\rm{a}}{\rm{n}}{\rm{t}}$$

(7)

Since the detunings need to be small for resonant excitation, a requirement for mode frequencies eqn. (1) arises. Furthermore, κk (k = p, s, i) is cavity loss rate, ΔD1,sD1,sD1,p, ΔD1,iD1,iD1,p, D1,k, D2,k are first- and second- order cavity dispersion parameters, g0, gXPM, gFWM are effective nonlinear self-phase-modulation, cross-phase-modulation (XPM) and four-wave-mixing (FWM) coefficients respectively (for definition see Supplementary Information), and \(F=\sqrt{{\kappa }_{{\text{ext}},{\text{p}}}{P}_{{\text{in}}}/\hslash {\omega }_{{\text{p}}}}\) is the pump term, where κext,p is the external coupling rate and Pin is the on-chip input power.

Analytical analysis

Several approximations are made to derive the analytical solution of eqns. (3)(4)(5). We focus on near-threshold behaviour where the power of the secondary soliton and idler sideband is much lower than the primary soliton, that \(| {E}_{\text{s}}|\),\(| {E}_{i}| \ll | {E}_{{\text{p}}}|\). The primary soliton takes the unperturbed soliton form

$${E}_{{\text{p}}}={A}_{{\text{p}}}{\text{sech}}(B\phi )$$

(8)

The dynamics of Es and Ei, with this Ep expression inserted, yields Schrödinger-type equations in a \({sech}^{2}\) potential well with parametric gain terms. The idler sideband is approximated as a continuous wave, while the secondary soliton exhibits ground-state solution as follows:

$${E}_{\text{s}}={A}_{{\text{s}}}{{\text{sech}}}^{\gamma }(B\phi ){e}^{-i\Delta {\mu }_{{\text{s}}}\phi }$$

(9)

The linear phase factor in Es results from FSR mismatch of the primary and secondary soliton forming mode families. Δμs denotes a shift in secondary soliton central mode from mode ωs,c. For γ and Δμs it is derived (detailed in the Supplementary Information),

$$\gamma (1+\gamma )=\frac{4{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}}{{g}_{0}}\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{p}}}}{{D}_{2,{\text{s}}}}$$

(11)

$$\Delta {\mu }_{{\text{s}}}=\frac{\Delta {D}_{1,{\text{s}}}}{{D}_{2,{\text{s}}}}$$

(12)

Eqn. (12) indicates that the central mode of secondary soliton is shifted to where the FSR of the soliton forming mode aligns with the primary soliton.

Furthermore, a threshold behaviour is predicted. Es and Ei compose a coupled linear system, where either exponential growth or decay can occur. The secondary soliton forms under exponential growth, when parametric gain overcomes cavity loss. By taking the inner product of both sides of eqns. (4)(5) with their respective eigenfunctions (9)(10), the equations reduce to a linear set of ordinary differential equations governing the evolution of Es and Ei amplitudes, and the threshold condition is readily obtained. Setting ΔD1,s = 0 for simplicity of expression, its threshold condition is calculated to be

$$\begin{array}{rcl} & & \frac{{\kappa }_{{\text{s}}}{\kappa }_{{\text{i}}}}{4}+{(\frac{\delta {\omega }_{{\text{s}}}+\delta {\omega }_{\text{i}}}{2}-\frac{{g}_{{\text{XPM}}}\sqrt{2{D}_{2,{\text{p}}}\delta {\omega }_{\text{p}}}}{\pi {g}_{0}}-{\gamma }^{2}\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{s}}}}{2{D}_{2,{\text{p}}}}\delta {\omega }_{{\text{p}}})}^{2}\\ & & -\frac{2| {g}_{\text{FWM}}{| }^{2}\delta {\omega }_{{\text{p}}}^{2}}{\pi {g}_{0}^{2}}\sqrt{\frac{{D}_{2,{\text{p}}}}{2\delta {\omega }_{{\text{p}}}}}\frac{\Pi {(\gamma +2)}^{2}}{\Pi (2\gamma )}=0\end{array}$$

(13)

where \(\Pi (t)\equiv {\int }_{-\infty }^{\infty }{{\text{sech}}}^{{\text{t}}}{\text{xdx}}\).

Numerical simulation

To confirm that the proposed mechanism enables multicolor interband solitons, numerical simulations are performed based on full coupled LLEs eqns. (3)–(5) using split-step Fourier transform method. For each dispersion band, 1024 modes are involved in the model.

In the simulation, the system is seeded by a single primary soliton. The results are summarized in Fig. 4. Simulated spectrum in Fig. 4a displays good similarity to experimental data in Fig. 1. The conclusions drawn from analytical model are also validated. To verify eqn. (11), dispersion parameter D2,s is tuned and exponent γ is determined by spectrum fitting at each D2,s. The analytical and numerical results are consistent (Fig. 4b). For eqn. (12), the central mode shift of the secondary soliton Δμs obtained from simulation and eqn. (12) are plotted together at different FSR mismatches ΔD1,s in Fig. 4c, also showing good agreement. Besides, it is numerically verified that XPM is essential to stable mode-locking of the secondary soliton (see Supplementary Information).

Fig. 4: Simulation results.
Fig. 4: Simulation results.

a Simulated optical spectrum. b Comparison of theoretical prediction and simulation result of secondary soliton pulse profile exponent γ versus second-order dispersion parameter D2,s. c Comparison of theoretical prediction and simulation result of secondary soliton central mode shift Δμs versus FSR mismatch ΔD1,s/2π. d Existence range of secondary soliton. Secondary soliton powers at different pump detunings δωp and FSR mismatches are plotted

Simulation parameters are listed as below. For Fig. 4a, ωp = 2π × 191.68 THz, Qint = 75 × 106, Qext = 200 × 106, δωp = 22.5κp, δωs = δωi = 12.5κp, ΔD1,s = 0, ΔD1,i = 2π × 31.8 MHz, D2,p = 2π × 353 kHz, D2,s = 2π × 159 kHz, D2,i = − 2π × 154 kHz, g0/2π = 4.33 × 10−3 Hz, gXPM/2π = 1.73 × 10−3 Hz, gFWM/2π = 1.73 × 10−3 Hz, Pin = 300 mW. Loss rates are derived by κext,p = ωp/Qext, κk = κint + κext = ωp/Qint + ωp/Qext (k = p, s, i). For Fig. 4b, ΔD1,s is fixed at 0. For Fig. 4c,d, D2,s is fixed at 2π × 159 kHz.

Threshold behaviour of the secondary soliton generation

Threshold behaviour is observed both experimentally and numerically, which is typical for parametric processes and predicted by the theory. When the pump laser scans across the mode from blue-detuned regime to red-detuned regime, a single primary soliton is generated at first, and the secondary soliton and idler sideband emerge when pump detuning reaches a certain threshold. Optical spectra below and above threshold detuning are shown in Fig. 5b.

Fig. 5: Threshold behaviour.
Fig. 5: Threshold behaviour.

a Experimental setup for soliton step measurement. EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier. PD, photodetector. OSC, oscilloscope. b Spectra below and above threshold measured under the same experimental conditions. c Simulation result of primary and secondary soliton power versus normalized pump detuning 2δωp/κp when the detuning is slowly ramped. When 2δωp/κp < 35.7, secondary soliton power is close to zero (below threshold). When 2δωp/κp > 35.7, secondary soliton power begins to increase, accompanied by a decrease in primary soliton power. Regions below (above) the threshold detuning is shaded in yellow (purple). d Simulated (left) and experimentally measured (right) soliton steps for primary and secondary solitons when pump detuning is scanned quickly. After the formation of the primary soliton, the secondary soliton does not emerge until a certain threshold detuning is reached

Measured and simulated soliton steps of primary and secondary solitons are also shown separately in Fig. 5d. The measurement setup is detailed in Fig. 5a. The comb output is amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) and equally split into two routes. Each route is directed to an optical waveshaper to filter out primary/secondary soliton only, and then detected by a photodetector (PD). The PD signals are received by an oscilloscope to monitor soliton power. Analogous to simulation result, the measurement also verifies the sequenced generation of primary and secondary solitons, indicating the existence of threshold detuning. In the numerical model, when pump detuning is slowly ramped, existence of threshold is observed explicitly (Fig. 5c). Normalized threshold detuning 2δωp/κp calculated from eqn. (13) with simulation parameters is 33.8, close to simulation value 35.7.

Furthermore, threshold behaviour in presence of FSR mismatch ΔD1,s/2π is studied. Comb spectra are simulated under different FSR mismatches and pump detunings δωp, and secondary soliton powers with respect to these parameters are plotted in Fig. 4d. Secondary soliton existence range is nearly symmetric with respect to ΔD1,s/2π = 0, and threshold pump detuning increases with FSR mismatch. The primary and secondary solitons simultaneously vanish when pump detuning exceeds the primary soliton existence limit.

Experimental details

In the autocorrelation measurement, the comb output from the cavity is firstly amplified to 70 mW by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), and then directed to a waveshaper. The waveshaper is programmed as a band-pass filter that filters out either the primary or the secondary soliton, and in its passband, a quadratic dispersion is applied to compensate fiber dispersion. After filtering, the comb is again amplified to 300 mW by a second EDFA before sent into an autocorrelator. The data in Fig. 1d,e is measured when dispersion compensation is optimized so that the pulses display the smallest temporal widths.

Full phase stabilization is achieved by simultaneous locking of frep (by servo locking) and fbeat (by disciplining to a stable microwave synthesizer25). It can be characterized by another inter-soliton beatnote with frequency frepfbeat. The noise of this beatnote will be significantly suppressed only when frep and fbeat are simultaneously stabilized. RF spectrum and phase noise data for the frepfbeat beatnote is plotted in Fig. 6. The phase noise of locked frepfbeat beatnote closely follows that of locked fbeat beatnote, while the noise of locked frep is below this level, indicating successful full phase stabilization. The two solitons form a coherent set of frequency comb with broader spectral range.

Fig. 6: Full phase stabilization.
Fig. 6: Full phase stabilization.

a Free-running and locked RF spectra of frepfbeat beatnote tone. b Phase noise of free-running and locked frepfbeat beatnote, compared with locked fbeat beatnote and locked repetition rate frep

In Fig. 3b and Fig. 4b, consistent with the proposed theory, the secondary soliton spectra are fitted by an envelope with form

$$P(\nu )={| {\text{FT}}\{{\text{a}}\,{{\text{sech}}}^{\gamma }(bt)\}(\nu -{\nu }_{{\text{s}}})| }^{2}$$

(14)

where FT denotes Fourier transform, P is power, ν is frequency, t is time, and a, b, γ, νs are fitting parameters.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *